The revenge of characterization data

It is a truth universally acknowledged that characterization data are useless to breeders. Well, universally acknowledged by breeders anyway. Morphological data are all well and good for genebank curators looking for duplicates and old-fashioned taxonomists, they say. But what we need is evaluation data, and lots of it.

As usual, I exaggerate; for effect, as usual. But I think it would certainly be true to say that detailed morphological descriptions of germplasm are not the highest priority thing breeders want out of genetic resources databases. That would probably be information on resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses.

And yet a paper just out in Euphytica shows that the former can be clues to the latter. A team at IRRI1 looked at the susceptibility of rice to sheath blight, an important disease throughout rice-growing areas, especially under intensive systems.2 They measured how 200 accessions did when inoculated with Rhizoctonia solani in the field. So far, so conventional.

But because the accessions were very carefully chosen (out of a total of over 100,000 in the IRRI genebank), the team, which included the genebank manager, were able to estimate to what extent differences in disease intensity were due to plant and canopy architecture — in other words, morphology — and how much to genetic susceptibility.

The accessions tested were selected to represent contrasting morphologies (based on leaf length, leaf angle and number of tillers, typical characterization descriptors), different phenologies (number of days to 80% flowering) and all the major varietal groups (indica, aus, aromatic, temperate, japonica and tropical japonica). It turned out that the lowest levels of disease intensity were found on a particular morpho-phenological group, and that this effect of morphology on disease intensity was much greater than any effect of genetic group, although the aus varietal group was markedly superior to the others.

The authors therefore recommend that breeders looking for sources of reduced susceptibility to sheath blight will find it most efficient to select taller accessions with wider leaves. Let us see what the breeders think. I’ll post this on GIPB and report back if there’s any reaction.

  1. And thanks to IRRI for the photo. []
  2. Susceptibility of rice to sheath blight: an assessment of the diversity of rice germplasm according to genetic groups and morphological traits. L. Willocquet, M. Noel, R. Sackville Hamilton and S. Savary. Euphytica. Online first. May 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0451-9. []

4 Replies to “The revenge of characterization data”

  1. I think such kind of experiments and lessons need to be repeated in other different crops such as wheat, barley and legume crops. So, if the pattern of results are repeated, then sure characterization data can help the plant breeders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *