- The US needs better maize.
- German genebank looks for the best potatoes.
- Vietnam looks for better rice in IRRI’s genebank.
- New Zealand markets an endophyte for better grass performance.
- Some Timor-Leste fish are better than others.
- The Himalayas have a better pea. Of some kind.
- How’s that for subversive cataloguing?
“Better” is doing a lot of work across these snippets: Vietnam is looking for rice in IRRI’s genebank, while the Timor-Leste item raises the question of which fish are better nutritionally. Those are different selection problems, and a gain in crop performance does not automatically establish a nutritional gain. I would want to know which traits define success in each case before treating any one variety or species as the winner.