Brainfood: Impact, Dietary guidelines, Diversity & diet, Wild cotton, Wild soybean, Italian rice & apples, Holstein genebank, Sugarcane evaluation, Quinoa boom, Bean landrace double, Brazilian fruits, Habitat restoration, Mixtures & pests

One Reply to “Brainfood: Impact, Dietary guidelines, Diversity & diet, Wild cotton, Wild soybean, Italian rice & apples, Holstein genebank, Sugarcane evaluation, Quinoa boom, Bean landrace double, Brazilian fruits, Habitat restoration, Mixtures & pests”

  1. “Pest suppression in cultivar mixtures”

    Is this just me? For barley they write of “monocultures and two-cultivar mixtures”. If it is all barley then it is a monoculture by definition. This playing with definitions was a problem (one of many) with the dreadful Zhu et al. paper in Nature in 2000, still cited to show monocultures are rubbish.
    As there is an enormous number of true polycultures (of different crop species) there must be an almost infinite range of monocultures (of a single crop) with a low to very high infraspecific genetic variation. Certainly this latter applies to almost all of the samples I collected from traditional farms over quite a few years in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. There is nothing whatever wrong with these monocultures. People glibly writing about `monocultures’ are doing a disservice to traditional agriculture based on landraces.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *