- A Population Genomics Perspective on the Emergence and Adaptation of New Plant Pathogens in Agro-Ecosystems. Crop diversity affects fungal diversity as much as the other way around. Actually more so, as fungal genomes are incredibly plastic.
- Teosinte as a model system for population and ecological genomics. Genetics of speciation, hybridization, various evolutionary questions: all can usefully be looked at in the maize-teosinte system with cheap next-generation sequencing. Oh, and that can help us with crop improvement.
- Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? –- A meta-analysis of European research. Per unit area, yes. Per unit product, not always. Need to mix and match. Good luck with that.
- “Healthy,” “diet,” or “hedonic”. How nutrition claims affect food-related perceptions and intake? If you tell people something is healthier, they believe it is, in fact, well, healthier.
- Guanaco management by pastoralists in the Southern Andes. They can coexist with cattle.
- Earthworms promote the reduction of Fusarium biomass and deoxynivalenol content in wheat straw under field conditions. Earthworms protect crops from pathogens.
- Screening of pea germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew. 14 accessions from 10 countries are promising. That’s out of 700. Hard row to hoe.
- Sources of high tolerance to salinity in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Out of some 780 accessions, China seems to be a hotspot, but the most tolerant accession was from Greece. Any overlap with the previous results?
- A rare case of natural regeneration in butternut, a threatened forest tree, is parent and space limited. In situ is not enough. Not if you don’t help it along, anyway.
- Relationship between survival and yield related traits in Solanum pimpinellifolium under salt stress. 2 accessions among a subset of over 90 from over 300 in the AVRDC collection show high survival and yield under stress. Would be interesting to know if the 90 were indeed well-chosen in the first place.
- Climate warming could shift the timing of seed germination in alpine plants. Spring emergence will shift to autumn, but the bad effect will be on the seedlings.
- Medieval emergence of sweet melons, Cucumis melo (Cucurbitaceae). Lexicography suggests that there were sweet melons in Central Asia early on, but they didn’t get to Iberia until the late 11th Century, and to the rest of Europe until the 15th. Climate and the clash of civilizations to blame, as ever.
- Tibet is one of the centers of domestication of cultivated barley. The other being the Fertile Crescent. Some Chinese hulless and six-rowed barleys in particular are similar to Tibetan wild material. But are the authors stretching the data?
- A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Or origins. Japonica first domesticated from O. rufipogon in the middle Pearl River in Southern China, and indica is a hybrid of the first cultivars with local wild rice in South East and South Asia. But have we not heard this before? Ah, but this paper has more, better markers, no doubt. Anyway, compare and contrast with maize and barley above.
- Lessons on the relationship between livestock husbandry and biodiversity from the Kenya Long-term Exclosure Experiment (KLEE). Livestock and wildlife can coexist, but you have to work at it. Bit like the guanaco thing, then?
- Modeling plant species distributions under future climates: how fine-scale do climate projections need to be? Doesn’t matter for total extent, but actual locations of stable climates vary with scale. On average, “270 m is fine enough,” but it really depends on the species. Probably safest answer is “as fine as possible.”
- Fertilisers and insect herbivores: a meta-analysis. Fertilizers good for insect numbers. Which means bad for plants? But insect diversity? Wonder what they do to those earthworms and fungi above…
Medieval emergence of sweet melons, Cucumis melo (Cucurbitaceae).
Good news — to celebrate the first ever Biology Week (13-19 October 2012) we can read this article for free.
See the scrolling window
“Enjoy Free Content from Oxford Journals…”
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/category/academic/promotions/science/biologyweek.do
Bad news — in spite of what they just promised, the Ann. Bot. link says today (middle of Biology Week) “You may access this article for 1 day for … … … … US$32.00.
http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/110/1/23.full.pdf+html
Shurely shum mishtake?
Definitely a mistake. We’re chasing it up to see what’s happening.
Thanks. Knew you would be on it.
Apologies – it is definitely freely available now. At the moment, we will make any paper freely accessible that is discussed in a blog or elsewhere!
Thanks, Pat. Good news after all.
Barley domestication: Tibet
Part of my work is on understanding cultivated barley origins, and this is an interesting paper. It does, however, have a number of limitations in how the results are presented and it is difficult (for me at least) to draw firm conclusions from the work.
For a fuller interpretation, the authors would really benefit from geo-referencing their samples, especially for the wild Tibet material they use. Does, for example, the genetic substructure they observe in this material correspond with the geography of Tibet?
Geo-referencing would also allow some environmental niche modelling of potential distribution, including in past climates, and this would facilitate comparison with wild barley further west… Clearly, there is much we need to learn.
The main point is… properly geo-referenced samples give so much more insight in a paper such as this…